fbpx

Court combines two defamation complaints brought by Thammakaset

(BANGKOK, August 18, 2020)—Thai authorities should end the judicial harassment of women human rights defenders by Thai chicken company Thammakaset Company Limited, said Fortify Rights today. On August 17, the Bangkok South Criminal Court combined two of four criminal defamation lawsuits brought by the company against three women human rights defenders. The Court is scheduled to decide whether to combine another two cases on September 14, 2020, after additional hearings on August 24 and 31.   

“Dismissing the case against these three women human rights defenders would reinforce Thailand’s commitment to business and human rights principles,” said Amy Smith, Executive Director of Fortify Rights. “The authorities should use available mechanisms to prevent this case from proceeding.” 

Between November 2019 and March 2020, Thammakaset filed five criminal defamation complaints against 2019 Ramon Magsaysay Award recipient and former National Human Rights Commissioner of Thailand Angkhana Neelapaijit, Fortify Rights Senior Thailand Human Rights Specialist Puttanee Kangkun, and former Fortify Rights Communications Associate Thanaporn Saleephol. The complaints all stem from respective social media posts by the three women expressing support for other human rights defenders facing judicial harassment by Thammakaset.

Angkhana Neelapaijit and Puttanee Kangkun attended mediation sessions with regard to the first complaint against them, but Thammakaset refused the process.

On August 4, the Bangkok South Criminal Court continued the hearing of the first complaint against Angkhana Neelapaijit and the next are scheduled for November 3 and 9, 2020.

On August 17, Thanaporn Salephol petitioned the court to dismiss the complaint against her on the grounds that the case was filed in “bad faith.” The court dismissed the request. However, the court agreed to combine the first complaint against Puttanee Kangkun with the complaint against Thanaporn Saleephol. Additional hearings are scheduled for August 24, 31, and September 14, and the latter will decide whether to combine all the complaints against Angkhana Neelapaijit, Puttanee Kangkun, and Thanaporn Saleephol.

Angkhana Neelapaijit, Puttanee Kangkun, Thanaporn Saleephol, and their supporters in front of the Bangkok South Criminal Court on August 17. ©Fortify Rights, 2020.

The company alleges that the women’s social media posts violate articles 326 and 328 of the Thai Criminal Code, which carries sentences of up to two years in prison and fines of up to 200,000 Thai Baht (US$6,400) per count. Angkhana Neelapaijit faces a total of four counts, Puttanee Kangkun faces 21 counts, and Thanaporn Saleephol faces five counts. 

The Community Resource Centre Foundation (CRC) is providing legal representation to all three women human rights defenders facing complaints by Thammakaset. 

Since January 2020, Thai courts have considered and either dismissed or found in favor of the defendants in at least seven cases brought by Thammakaset. Most recently, on July 30, the Bangkok South Civil Court ruled in favor of Voice T.V. after Thammakaset brought suit against the Thai media outlet for a report on labor conditions at a farm operated by the company. On July 16, the Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal of a criminal defamation complaint against peace studies and human rights lecturer Ngamsuk Ruttanasatian for a social media post. On June 8, the Bangkok Criminal Court acquitted human rights defenders Nan Win and Sutharee Wannasiri of criminal defamation charges for their involvement in Fortify Rights-related activities. On March 24, the Saraburi Provincial Court acquitted another criminal complaint against Nan Win in which the company accused Nan Win of providing false testimony to the court in an earlier labor dispute case between Thammakaset and its workers. On March 18, the Lopburi Sub-District Court dismissed a similar criminal complaint against three former Thammakaset workers and the coordinator of the Migrant Worker Rights Network, Suthasinee Kaewleklai, for allegedly providing false information to an official about labor conditions on Thammakaset’s farm.

Since 2016, the company has brought at least 37 complaints against 22 human rights defenders.

On March 10, 2020, a group of U.N. experts issued a communication letter to the Thai government, raising concern about “the continued judicial harassment by Thammakaset Co. Ltd (Thammakaset), of human rights defenders, migrant workers, journalists and academics for denouncing exploitative working conditions of migrant workers at the poultry farm of this Thai company.” 

The 2020 United States Trafficking in Persons Report, published in July 2020, reiterated concerns with Thailand’s criminal defamation laws, saying, “[T]he government’s criminal defamation laws continued to allow companies to pursue criminal charges against potential victims and advocates.” 

The 2017 Constitution of Thailand protects the right to freedom of expression, as does Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Thailand is a State Party. The Thai National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights includes the protection of human rights defenders from Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP). 

In 2018, the National Legislative Assembly amended Section 161/1 of the Thailand Criminal Procedure Code, allowing courts to dismiss and forbid the refiling of a complaint by a private individual if the complaint is filed “in bad faith or with misrepresentation of facts in order to harass or take advantage of a defendant.” Despite this mechanism, cases brought by Thammakaset targeting human rights defenders, and particularly women human rights defenders, continue to proceed. 

Stay Updated!

Subscribe to our mailing to receive periodic updates human rights issues where we work.